You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems to suggest that standard monotonic constraints to tree based models constrain the model too tightly and harshly impact predictive accuracy. They propose two new methods to improve on the current methods. Here is how much better it can perform on the The Adult dataset. Monotonic constraints were on: age, education and hours_per_week. You could see how these features could be legally required to be monotonic in certain regulated spaces:
Here is a paper called: A better method to enforce monotonic constraints in regression and classification trees
https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.00986
It seems to suggest that standard monotonic constraints to tree based models constrain the model too tightly and harshly impact predictive accuracy. They propose two new methods to improve on the current methods. Here is how much better it can perform on the The Adult dataset. Monotonic constraints were on: age, education and hours_per_week. You could see how these features could be legally required to be monotonic in certain regulated spaces:
Here are the examples of the changes added to LightGBM:
microsoft/LightGBM#3264
microsoft/LightGBM#2939
microsoft/LightGBM#2770
The Parameters for the model are as follows. I feel this should give a good quick high-level explanation of how/why the new functionality might work:
https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/blob/aab8fc18a259ca9ca95db5bac203b81cb2e1ad49/docs/Parameters.rst#monotone_constraints_method
Here is a nice theoretical example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: