-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The open() method is not well suited to hot-plugged SPI device controllers (e.g. USB, Thunderbolt, PCIe and similar situations). #129
Comments
Prep for adding open_path Python method in doceme#129
Prep for adding open_path Python method in doceme#129
Adds to the functionality provided by the open() call (which hard-codes the opening of /dev/spidev<bus>.<chipselect> device file paths). Because the bus number allocation may not be knowable in advance (bus numbers are dynamically allocated by the Linux kernel), open_path() allows the user to employ udev rules to deterministically create a symlink to the correct hardware device at boot and/or hot-plug time. Resolves doceme#129
Adds to the functionality provided by the open() call (which hard-codes the opening of /dev/spidev<bus>.<chipselect> device file paths). Because the bus number allocation may not be knowable in advance (bus numbers are dynamically allocated by the Linux kernel), open_path() allows the user to employ udev rules to deterministically create a symlink to the correct hardware device at boot and/or hot-plug time. Part of doceme#129
Prep for adding open_path Python method in doceme#129
Prep for adding open_path Python method in doceme#129
Adds to the functionality provided by the open() call (which hard-codes the opening of /dev/spidev<bus>.<chipselect> device file paths). Because the bus number allocation may not be knowable in advance (bus numbers are dynamically allocated by the Linux kernel), open_path() allows the user to employ udev rules to deterministically create a symlink to the correct hardware device at boot and/or hot-plug time. Part of doceme#129
This is a good point, and thank you for your PR. I need to find the time to test this, since I am able to accept PRs on my fork and release a new version of the spidev Python library if it makes sense. I'm currently fighting bugs on Pi 5, however, but after that I'll be updating some libraries that use spidev and it would make sense for me to test changes like this then. |
Thanks, any feedback is welcome. An organisation I work with has put this code into production, so it's received a reasonably amount of testing on a couple of different 32 bit ARM systems. I've also used it with USB to SPI adapters on x86-64. |
The Linux kernel usually doesn't guarantee that SPI bus numbers are predictable and persistent across reboots, and kernel upgrades etc.
As with other device special files (e.g. storage devices, network devices, serial ports), the Linux udev subsystem is the generic mechanism for creating persistent/predictable names for devices (including SPI bus numbers).
Whilst in many cases the SPI bus number is predicable (e.g. Raspberry Pi OS maintainers take steps to ensure the spi bus number remains stable), in general this is not the case (e.g. Beaglebone Black has swapped SPI bus numbers 0 and 1 more than once between major Linux kernel version upgrades).
Unfortunately the current
open()
method requires that the user of the extension knows the bus number because it hard-codes the use of/dev/spidevX.Y
.A solution would be to add a second alternative call e.g.
open_path()
which would allow the user to supply a persistent device name such as/dev/spi/by-path/ftdi232h_7821067-cs0
. Such a filesystem path would typically be created automatically by theudev
daemon when, and would take the form of a symbolic link to a (non-predictable) spidev character device file e.g./dev/spidev/14.0
.Having studied the codebase, it would be possible to keep the existing
open()
call (for backward compatibility), whilst adding a more genericopen_path()
alternative.I'll prepare a PR with a draft implementation, along with some sample udev rules, and documentation updates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: