Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect singular and plural for addendum and addenda #234

Open
robertmylne opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Incorrect singular and plural for addendum and addenda #234

robertmylne opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@robertmylne
Copy link

Using Laravel for this, but it uses Inflector under the hood.

> Str::plural('addendum')
= "addendums" // should be `addenda`

> Str::singular('addenda')                                                                                                                                                                                 
= "addenda" // should be `addendum`
@malarzm
Copy link
Member

malarzm commented Oct 23, 2023

addendums is correct pluralization according to https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/addendum

@garrettw
Copy link

@malarzm Wiktionary lists both as valid. This is one of those weird cases where the true Latin form has largely fallen out of favor, so -ums may indeed be the preferred plural form now. (Another weird case like this is "data" -- where we don't commonly use the true Latin singular form "datum" anymore.)

@robertmylne
Copy link
Author

Well you would have to go with the one that people use the most in the real world, which is addenda, for most people addendums seems incorrect.

Google graphs the usage of words in literature, and you can see the comparison here: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=addenda%2Caddendums&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3

Screenshot 2023-11-01 121544

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants