You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 29, 2021. It is now read-only.
Most code changes are performed via PRs, and open to community feedback and transparent viewing. The specific review and merge process used is a project choice.
Versioning and breaking change policy is documented.
Roadmap is documented, via formal document and/or an issue query.
Build scripts are documented and can be readily used by consumers.
I think there should be some (optional) guidance about what this documentation should look like and where it should live. e.g.
Document discussing making PRs and the process: CONTRIBUTING.md
Document discussing versioning: VERSIONING.md
Document discussing roadmap: ROADMAP.md
Document discussing build: probably also in CONTRIBUTING.md
I don't know if VERSIONING.md/ROADMAP.md are things, I just made them up. Would be worth investigating other eco-systems to see whether they have standards around these documents.
Also a template or example would be useful. In the long term I think you'll save time in giving feedback by having a sample/template of each document to give to projects.
By having some (optional) guidance and structure around these files it will help the community. People will know there are common places they can look in source repositories to find this information.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like the spirit of this idea. In fact, if you host your project on GitHub, it has a page where you can see how your project fares according to its community standards: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/community
I think that would be a nice recommended set of documentation. It's a shorter list than what @JamesNK wrote. But a some of the files listed could be merged together. For example, COMPILING.md might be part of CONTRIBUTING.md or the README.md. Ideally it's a one-liner with a build script. 😄
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
These 4 requirements under level 1:
I think there should be some (optional) guidance about what this documentation should look like and where it should live. e.g.
I don't know if VERSIONING.md/ROADMAP.md are things, I just made them up. Would be worth investigating other eco-systems to see whether they have standards around these documents.
Also a template or example would be useful. In the long term I think you'll save time in giving feedback by having a sample/template of each document to give to projects.
By having some (optional) guidance and structure around these files it will help the community. People will know there are common places they can look in source repositories to find this information.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: