Should the dotnet/sdk image include libxml2 in order to support dotnet-coverage? #4183
RobinsonWM
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
That's a great question. I've created an issue for this and we'll discuss it in triage: #4184 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In the
dotnet/sdk
image, if I rundotnet tool install dotnet-coverage
and then run unit tests with code coverage, the result is an empty coverage report, and this message is logged to the console:The code coverage tool requires
libxml2
, as documented on this GitHub issue: microsoft/vstest#981 (comment)Since code coverage should be a common thing to do when using the
dotnet/sdk
image, should we consider includinglibxml2
? In my particular case, my CI builds run in a Docker container but not as root, so I have to jump through hoops to installlibxml2
.Also see microsoft/vstest#3400
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions