Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CHECKCFG allows duplicate languages #103

Open
RGHenderson opened this issue May 23, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

CHECKCFG allows duplicate languages #103

RGHenderson opened this issue May 23, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@RGHenderson
Labels
bug

Comments

@RGHenderson
Copy link
Contributor

Currently no validation is in place to disallow the same language being configured twice in the one configuration file. We should introduce a validation (error severity) and a quick-fix to merge the configs, deleting the duplicates.
@RGHenderson RGHenderson self-assigned this May 23, 2018
RGHenderson pushed a commit to RGHenderson/dsl-devkit that referenced this issue May 23, 2018
\dsldevkit#103: CHECKCFG allows duplicate languages
42ac756 
 - Add validation against duplicate language configurations in a CHECKCFG
   file
 - Add quickfix to remove duplicates by merging their contents
RGHenderson pushed a commit to RGHenderson/dsl-devkit that referenced this issue May 23, 2018
dsldevkit#103: CHECKCFG allows duplicate languages
7f9247b 
 - Add validation against duplicate language configurations in a
CHECKCFG
   file
 - Add quickfix to remove duplicates by merging their contents
RGHenderson pushed a commit to RGHenderson/dsl-devkit that referenced this issue May 23, 2018
dsldevkit#103: CHECKCFG allows duplicate languages
a5fe3c6 
 - Add validation against duplicate language configurations in a
CHECKCFG
   file
 - Add quickfix to remove duplicates by merging their contents
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@RGHenderson RGHenderson

Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@RGHenderson