Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature 2673 sonarqube beta6 vector dictionary #2994

Merged

Conversation

hsoh-u
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsoh-u hsoh-u commented Oct 14, 2024

Expected Differences

Reduced code smells on python code
Used vector instead of new statements.
One bug was identified as a new bug at src/tools/core/mode/mode_exec.cc. I will take a look

  • Do these changes introduce new tools, command line arguments, or configuration file options? [No]

    If yes, please describe:

  • Do these changes modify the structure of existing or add new output data types (e.g. statistic line types or NetCDF variables)? [No]

    If yes, please describe:

Pull Request Testing

  • Describe testing already performed for these changes:

Unittest with the same outputs

  • Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:

N/A

  • Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [No]

  • Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [No]

  • Will this PR result in changes to the MET test suite? [No]

    If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:

  • Will this PR result in changes to existing METplus Use Cases? [No]

    If yes, create a new Update Truth METplus issue to describe them.

  • Do these changes introduce new SonarQube findings? [No]

    If yes, please describe:

One bug was identified as a new bug at src/tools/core/mode/mode_exec.cc.

  • Please complete this pull request review by [Fill in date].

Pull Request Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

  • Review the source issue metadata (required labels, projects, and milestone).
  • Complete the PR definition above.
  • Ensure the PR title matches the feature or bugfix branch name.
  • Define the PR metadata, as permissions allow.
    Select: Reviewer(s) and Development issue
    Select: Milestone as the version that will include these changes
    Select: Coordinated METplus-X.Y Support project for bugfix releases or MET-X.Y.Z Development project for official releases
  • After submitting the PR, select the ⚙️ icon in the Development section of the right hand sidebar. Search for the issue that this PR will close and select it, if it is not already selected.
  • After the PR is approved, merge your changes. If permissions do not allow this, request that the reviewer do the merge.
  • Close the linked issue and delete your feature or bugfix branch from GitHub.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that this testing workflow run failed. Please fix those failures and re-request my review.

@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway added this to the MET-12.0.0 milestone Oct 15, 2024
@hsoh-u
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hsoh-u commented Oct 15, 2024

I rolled back the changes (pointer to vector) at src/tools/core/mode/mode_exec.cc to avoid introducing a new bug. Looks like unittest is not done.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve of these changes. I see that the GHA testing workflow flagged no differences and that the total number of SonarQube findings are reduced from 18,476 to 18,331.

I do note that the bug in src/libcode/vx_python3_utils/wchar_argv.cc remains, and we'll need to fix that prior to the MET-12.0.0 release in December, 2024. But these changes do reduce the overall number of code smells as intended.

@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway linked an issue Oct 16, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
21 tasks
@hsoh-u
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hsoh-u commented Oct 16, 2024

Please review again.

  • There were code conflicts at src/libcode/vx_python3_utils/wchar_argv.cc. It's resolved.
  • 6 files are missing at point_weight.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve of these changes.

I see that the SonarQube code smells are further reduced to 18,323.

@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway merged commit 48f394f into develop Oct 16, 2024
39 of 41 checks passed
@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway deleted the feature_2673_sonarqube_beta6_vector_dictionary branch October 16, 2024 20:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🏁 Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix the SonarQube findings for MET version 12.0.0
2 participants