You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
EFS has an infrequent access storage class, which is quite a bit cheaper than the standard storage class, but you do end up paying for data transfer when you access the data. There's settings on the file system you can configure to have the data within automatically move from standard to infrequent access classes if the data is unused for a set period of time, then back after it is accessed to avoid data transfer costs. See CloudFormation attribute for lifecycle rules.
It may be cheaper to always use infrequent access, given the size of the data we typically request. That may change after ~1y, so probably do the math so see what's up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We're only storing about 50Mb in EFS still (only /weather uses it). The cost to leave it entirely in standard storage will be $0.01 - $0.02 per month, depending on rounding. I'll leave the issue open, but won't be working on it until we start using the database quite a bit more.
EFS has an infrequent access storage class, which is quite a bit cheaper than the standard storage class, but you do end up paying for data transfer when you access the data. There's settings on the file system you can configure to have the data within automatically move from standard to infrequent access classes if the data is unused for a set period of time, then back after it is accessed to avoid data transfer costs. See CloudFormation attribute for lifecycle rules.
It may be cheaper to always use infrequent access, given the size of the data we typically request. That may change after ~1y, so probably do the math so see what's up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: