You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The output shape during training of ControlNext 1.5 is 1,320,64,64, while the shape during inference of ControlNext is 1,1280,8,8. This leads to differences in the way the sample addition in the UNet is performed. I would like to ask why there is such a difference? Additionally, the ControlNext inference weights for SD 1.5 currently cannot load the ControlNext training weights. So, which script did you use to train the ControlNet 1.5 weights that you released on Hugging Face?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The output shape during training of ControlNext 1.5 is 1,320,64,64, while the shape during inference of ControlNext is 1,1280,8,8. This leads to differences in the way the sample addition in the UNet is performed. I would like to ask why there is such a difference? Additionally, the ControlNext inference weights for SD 1.5 currently cannot load the ControlNext training weights. So, which script did you use to train the ControlNet 1.5 weights that you released on Hugging Face?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: