Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
if we want to keep Base Site super clean, we could move any modules with page types to recipe:
I believe the following could be removed from base site:
I believe the following could be removed from recipe base site:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Proposed Base Site Requirements' {
"axllent/silverstripe-email-obfuscator": "^2.0",
"axllent/silverstripe-scaled-uploads": "^2.1",
"dnadesign/silverstripe-elemental": "^4.0",
"innoweb/silverstripe-social-metadata": "^7.0",
"jonom/silverstripe-betternavigator": "^4.0",
"jonom/silverstripe-text-target-length": "^2.0",
"silverstripe/sharedraftcontent": "^2.0",
"silverstripe/spamprotection": "^3.0",
"unclecheese/display-logic": "^2.0",
"wilr/silverstripe-googlesitemaps": "^2.1",
"axllent/silverstripe-bootstrap-forms": "^2.0",
"axllent/silverstripe-version-truncator": "^2.0",
"silverstripe/redirectedurls": "^2.0",
"silverstripe/spamprotection": "^3.0",
"tractorcow/silverstripe-robots": "^4.0"
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Along with the next major releases of base site and recipe base site, we'll be doing an exercise to ensure package requirements are organized for best use cases based on whether the recipe is used or not in a website. Below are the requirements per module/recipe:
dynamic/silverstripe-base-site
Note:
innoweb/silverstripe-social-meta
is a new additiondynamic/recipe-silverstripe-base-site
The above are some examples of thoughts that will drive where packages live and what migration tools will be needed to move data to newer modules now used.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions