You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".
RFC7677: SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7677 - since 2015-11-02
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".
It is possible to have?
Main code:
-> https://github.com/pear/Auth_SASL/blob/master/Auth/SASL/SCRAM.php
-> https://github.com/pear/Auth_SASL2/blob/master/Auth/SASL2/SCRAM.php
A fork:
-> https://github.com/fabiang/sasl
SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS):
SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS):
-PLUS variants:
Soon RFCs:
LDAP:
HTTP:
IANA:
Linked to:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: