Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Heartbeat/Synthetics] Ability to map resolving DNS server(s) #33055

Closed
BenB196 opened this issue Sep 12, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

[Heartbeat/Synthetics] Ability to map resolving DNS server(s) #33055

BenB196 opened this issue Sep 12, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
Stalled Team:obs-ds-hosted-services Label for the Observability Hosted Services team

Comments

@BenB196
Copy link

BenB196 commented Sep 12, 2022

Describe the enhancement:

I would like the ability to track/map the DNS server(s) which were used for resolving a host.

Describe a specific use case for the enhancement or feature:

Today, Heartbeat/synthetics tracks the time to resolve a host via the field resolve.rtt.us. An issue/gap here though, is it doesn't track which DNS server(s) it attempted to contact for this. If I provide a list of DNS servers to Heartbeat/synthetics, it is my understand that Heartbeat will follow the OSes DNS server order (ex: Linux tries DNS servers in the order they're in in resolve.conf). It would be helpful for troubleshooting to know which DNS server Heartbeat/synthetics got a response from, to help troubleshoot potential DNS related issues.

@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Sep 12, 2022
@endorama endorama added the Team:obs-ds-hosted-services Label for the Observability Hosted Services team label Sep 19, 2022
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/uptime (Team:Uptime)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Sep 19, 2022
@andrewvc
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the ping @BenB196 , it's a great idea, but candidly one we haven't had much interest in. Would you be interested in submitting a patch? We'd be glad to review one, but it probably won't land on our roadmap anytime soon without broader interest.

@andrewvc
Copy link
Contributor

By the way @BenB196 I am curious to hear more about your use case etc, if you'd like to connect on a call sometime reach out on the community slack channel , we'd love to hear from you. You can find it here: https://elasticstack.slack.com/archives/CNRTHRCLD

@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Sep 19, 2023

Hi!
We just realized that we haven't looked into this issue in a while. We're sorry!

We're labeling this issue as Stale to make it hit our filters and make sure we get back to it as soon as possible. In the meantime, it'd be extremely helpful if you could take a look at it as well and confirm its relevance. A simple comment with a nice emoji will be enough :+1.
Thank you for your contribution!

@botelastic botelastic bot added the Stalled label Sep 19, 2023
@botelastic botelastic bot closed this as completed Mar 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Stalled Team:obs-ds-hosted-services Label for the Observability Hosted Services team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants