Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auditbeat: Split common tty definitions #42004

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

auditbeat: Split common tty definitions #42004

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

haesbaert
Copy link
Contributor

@haesbaert haesbaert commented Dec 12, 2024

Proposed commit message

No functional changes, just move tty things to a common place so that the upcoming system/process provider can use it.

Last of the PRs to split common code for the new system/process provider (I promise).

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
    - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
    - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
    - [ ] I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
    - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

No functional changes, just move tty things to a common place so that the
upcoming system/process provider can use it.

Last of the PRs to split common code for the new system/process provider (I
promise).
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 12, 2024

This pull request does not have a backport label.
If this is a bug or security fix, could you label this PR @haesbaert? 🙏.
For such, you'll need to label your PR with:

  • The upcoming major version of the Elastic Stack
  • The upcoming minor version of the Elastic Stack (if you're not pushing a breaking change)

To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-8./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 12, 2024

backport-8.x has been added to help with the transition to the new branch 8.x.
If you don't need it please use backport-skip label and remove the backport-8.x label.

@mergify mergify bot added the backport-8.x Automated backport to the 8.x branch with mergify label Dec 12, 2024
@haesbaert haesbaert marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2024 09:18
@haesbaert haesbaert requested a review from a team as a code owner December 12, 2024 09:18
@haesbaert haesbaert added the Team:Security-Linux Platform Linux Platform Team in Security Solution label Dec 12, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/sec-linux-platform (Team:Security-Linux Platform)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Dec 12, 2024
@haesbaert haesbaert enabled auto-merge (squash) December 12, 2024 09:19
@haesbaert haesbaert disabled auto-merge December 12, 2024 09:21
@haesbaert haesbaert enabled auto-merge (squash) December 12, 2024 09:23
@haesbaert haesbaert merged commit 560b842 into main Dec 12, 2024
30 checks passed
@haesbaert haesbaert deleted the split-tty branch December 12, 2024 11:02
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
No functional changes, just move tty things to a common place so that the
upcoming system/process provider can use it.

Last of the PRs to split common code for the new system/process provider (I
promise).

(cherry picked from commit 560b842)
michalpristas pushed a commit to michalpristas/beats that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
No functional changes, just move tty things to a common place so that the
upcoming system/process provider can use it.

Last of the PRs to split common code for the new system/process provider (I
promise).
haesbaert added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
No functional changes, just move tty things to a common place so that the
upcoming system/process provider can use it.

Last of the PRs to split common code for the new system/process provider (I
promise).

(cherry picked from commit 560b842)

Co-authored-by: Christiano Haesbaert <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-8.x Automated backport to the 8.x branch with mergify enhancement Team:Security-Linux Platform Linux Platform Team in Security Solution
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants