Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[osquerybeat] Upgrade to 5.15.0 #43426

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mjwolf
Copy link
Contributor

@mjwolf mjwolf commented Mar 22, 2025

Proposed commit message

Upgrade the upstream osquery version included with osquerybeat to 5.15.0.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

Disruptive User Impact

This will change osquery tables caused by the changes included in upstream osquery

Related PRs

@mjwolf mjwolf added breaking change Osquerybeat Team:Security-Deployment and Devices Deployment and Devices Team in Security Solution labels Mar 22, 2025
@mjwolf mjwolf self-assigned this Mar 22, 2025
@mjwolf mjwolf requested a review from a team as a code owner March 22, 2025 01:25
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/sec-deployment-and-devices (Team:Security-Deployment and Devices)

@botelastic botelastic bot added needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label and removed needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label labels Mar 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 22, 2025

This pull request does not have a backport label.
If this is a bug or security fix, could you label this PR @mjwolf? 🙏.
For such, you'll need to label your PR with:

  • The upcoming major version of the Elastic Stack
  • The upcoming minor version of the Elastic Stack (if you're not pushing a breaking change)

To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-8./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit
  • backport-active-all is the label that automatically backports to all active branches.
  • backport-active-8 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 8 major.
  • backport-active-9 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 9 major.

@mjwolf mjwolf added backport-8.x Automated backport to the 8.x branch with mergify backport-8.17 Automated backport with mergify backport-8.18 Automated backport to the 8.18 branch backport-9.0 Automated backport to the 9.0 branch labels Mar 24, 2025
@mjwolf mjwolf added backport-active-8 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 8.[0-9]+ branches backport-active-9 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 9.[0-9]+ branches labels Mar 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-8.x Automated backport to the 8.x branch with mergify backport-8.17 Automated backport with mergify backport-8.18 Automated backport to the 8.18 branch backport-9.0 Automated backport to the 9.0 branch backport-active-8 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 8.[0-9]+ branches backport-active-9 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 9.[0-9]+ branches breaking change Osquerybeat Team:Security-Deployment and Devices Deployment and Devices Team in Security Solution
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants