Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[apm] Make apm guide URLs apm specific and unified #3573

Closed
simitt opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

[apm] Make apm guide URLs apm specific and unified #3573

simitt opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@simitt
Copy link
Contributor

simitt commented Jan 25, 2024

The apm guide recently moved to https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/observability/current/apm.html. The URLs of the guide should now be following a common naming schema indicating to be part of the apm guide.
For example, the synthetics guide prefixes everything with synthetics- (https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/observability/8.12/synthetics-support-matrix.html).

At the moment this leads to several URL that look like generic observability URLs, but only contain apm specific content, such as https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/observability/8.12/release-notes-8.12.html.

cc @colleenmcginnis


Once the link to the release notes change, a bit of follow up work must happen so that releases point to the right documentation:

@simitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

simitt commented Mar 11, 2024

@bmorelli25 I see that this considered for next sprint in January, has there been any update on this?
For now, we move forward with the release note URLs as they are.

@bmorelli25 bmorelli25 mentioned this issue Mar 13, 2024
6 tasks
@bmorelli25 bmorelli25 self-assigned this Mar 14, 2024
@bmorelli25
Copy link
Member

Hi @simitt. I have a PR open to address this problem: #3674.

@bmorelli25
Copy link
Member

Draft infra PR is up and linked above this comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants