You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
1.Integrate a natural language linter like Vale into the Electron documentation workflow.
2.Implement spell check and grammar rules to ensure consistent language usage across all documentation pages.
3.Define style libraries and extension points within the linter to enforce project-specific writing guidelines and conventions.
4.Configure the linter to check for common writing errors, improve readability, and suggest enhancements for technical content.
5.Provide guidelines and documentation on how contributors can use the linter during the documentation writing and review process.
Benefits:
Improved documentation quality with consistent spelling, grammar, and style.
Enhanced readability and understanding of technical content for users and contributors.
Facilitates collaboration by establishing clear writing standards and guidelines.
Supports the long-term maintainability and scalability of the Electron documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Personally a -1 on additional linting checks for now because I often use gitbook.com to author my changes to this repository and they don't support exporting their changelists to GitHub PRs.
We have a workaround for some of our basic code block linting that auto-commits with a bot, but I think that wouldn't work for something like a natural language linter.
Description
The Vale Linter (natural language linter) implements spell check and other basic rules.
_https://github.com/errata-ai/vale
Proposed Changes:
1.Integrate a natural language linter like Vale into the Electron documentation workflow.
2.Implement spell check and grammar rules to ensure consistent language usage across all documentation pages.
3.Define style libraries and extension points within the linter to enforce project-specific writing guidelines and conventions.
4.Configure the linter to check for common writing errors, improve readability, and suggest enhancements for technical content.
5.Provide guidelines and documentation on how contributors can use the linter during the documentation writing and review process.
Benefits:
Improved documentation quality with consistent spelling, grammar, and style.
Enhanced readability and understanding of technical content for users and contributors.
Facilitates collaboration by establishing clear writing standards and guidelines.
Supports the long-term maintainability and scalability of the Electron documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: