You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Eric & @SNPLift,
I tried to run SNPLift but had not indexed the reference genomes, and SNPLift although warned me about the lack of indexing, did return a single value in the standard output reporting. This made it seem like it ran successfully, but it did not. It might be good to put in a flag that if the genomes aren't indexed to stop the run and not give outputs.
I indexed the ref genomes, re-ran, and it ran great!
Standard output to screen without the ref genomes being indexed:
./snplift 02_infos/snplift_config.sh
SNPLift v1.0.4
Start: 20231008_104651
SNPLift: Validating input files and dependencies
- Config file found
- Old genome found
- New genome found
- Input file found
- python3 is recent enough:
needed: 3.5.0+; installed: 3.10.12
- R is recent enough:
needed: 3.0.0+; installed: 4.1.2
- parallel is recent enough:
needed: 20180101+; installed: 20210822
- bash is recent enough:
needed: 4.0.0+; installed: 5.1.16
- bwa is recent enough:
needed: 0.7.0+; installed: 0.7.17-r1198-dirty
- samtools is recent enough:
needed: 1.10+; installed: 1.16.1
SNPLift: Using 20 CPUs
SNPLift: Skipping collinearity assessment
SNPLift: Skipping genome indexing
> NOTE: Use only if the genome is already indexed with 'bwa index'
SNPLift: Extracting positions from input file
SNPLift: Extracting flanking sequences around SNPs
SNPLift: Mapping flanking sequences on new genome
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
[E::bwa_idx_load_from_disk] fail to locate the index files
SNPLift: Extract features from alignments
SNPLift: Skipping visualization
SNPLift: Score markers based on extracted features
SNPLift: Getting coordinates of transferable SNPs
SNPLift: Writing output file with updated coordinates
SNPLift: Number of SNPs treated at each step
1069 Positions
0 Scores
1 Transferable
SNPLift: Percentage of transferred SNPs:
.093545%
SNPLift: Run completed
End: 20231008_104654
real 0m3.060s
user 0m36.019s
sys 0m34.068s
I ran it again after indexing the ref genomes, and received 96.2% transfer - very nice!
Thank you,
Ben
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
enormandeau
changed the title
SNPLift still runs to completion if genomes are not indexed, but returns a single transferred SNP
SNPLift should crash if genome is not indexed
Jan 31, 2024
Hi Eric & @SNPLift,
I tried to run SNPLift but had not indexed the reference genomes, and SNPLift although warned me about the lack of indexing, did return a single value in the standard output reporting. This made it seem like it ran successfully, but it did not. It might be good to put in a flag that if the genomes aren't indexed to stop the run and not give outputs.
I indexed the ref genomes, re-ran, and it ran great!
Standard output to screen without the ref genomes being indexed:
I ran it again after indexing the ref genomes, and received 96.2% transfer - very nice!
Thank you,
Ben
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: