eunomia-bpf
diff --git a/‎data/commit_survey.csv
+4,136 b/‎data/commit_survey.csv
+4,136
diff --git a/‎docs/distribute.txt
+127-126 b/‎docs/distribute.txt
+127-126
diff --git a/‎docs/report_ebpf.md
+9-2 b/‎docs/report_ebpf.md
+9-2
diff --git a/‎imgs/commit_pie_chart_commit_classification.png
-567 Bytes b/‎imgs/commit_pie_chart_commit_classification.png
-567 Bytes
diff --git a/‎imgs/commit_pie_chart_commit_complexity.png
-210 Bytes b/‎imgs/commit_pie_chart_commit_complexity.png
-210 Bytes
diff --git a/‎imgs/commit_pie_chart_major_implementation_component.png
-1.7 KB b/‎imgs/commit_pie_chart_major_implementation_component.png
-1.7 KB
diff --git a/‎imgs/commit_pie_chart_major_logic_component.png
434 Bytes b/‎imgs/commit_pie_chart_major_logic_component.png
434 Bytes
diff --git a/‎imgs/commit_pie_chart_usecases_or_submodule_events.png
200 Bytes b/‎imgs/commit_pie_chart_usecases_or_submodule_events.png
200 Bytes
diff --git a/‎imgs/instruction_verifier_features_bugs_over_time.png
11.8 KB b/‎imgs/instruction_verifier_features_bugs_over_time.png
11.8 KB
diff --git a/‎imgs/timeline_commit_classification_smoothed.png
14.4 KB b/‎imgs/timeline_commit_classification_smoothed.png
14.4 KB
diff --git a/‎imgs/timeline_commit_complexity_smoothed.png
12.4 KB b/‎imgs/timeline_commit_complexity_smoothed.png
12.4 KB
diff --git a/‎imgs/timeline_libbpf_commit_classification_smoothed.png
14.5 KB b/‎imgs/timeline_libbpf_commit_classification_smoothed.png
14.5 KB
diff --git a/‎imgs/timeline_major_related_implementation_component_smoothed.png
19.1 KB b/‎imgs/timeline_major_related_implementation_component_smoothed.png
19.1 KB
diff --git a/‎imgs/timeline_major_related_logic_component_smoothed.png
10.2 KB b/‎imgs/timeline_major_related_logic_component_smoothed.png
10.2 KB
diff --git a/‎imgs/timeline_usecases_or_submodule_events_smoothed.png
14.4 KB b/‎imgs/timeline_usecases_or_submodule_events_smoothed.png
14.4 KB
diff --git a/‎output_commit_survey1.txt
+145,651 b/‎output_commit_survey1.txt
+145,651
diff --git a/‎output_commit_syrvey1.txt
+87,940 b/‎output_commit_syrvey1.txt
+87,940
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ In this section, we apply the *Code-survey* methodology to analyze the evolution
     - [Commit related to Major Logic Component Over Time](#commit-related-to-major-logic-component-over-time)
     - [Use cases or events Over Time](#use-cases-or-events-over-time)
     - [Commit Complexity Over Time](#commit-complexity-over-time)
-  - [Deeper insight Analysis](#deeper-insight-analysis)
+  - [Deeper insights Analysis](#deeper-insights-analysis)
+    - [What kernel components has the most frequently bugs?](#what-kernel-components-has-the-most-frequently-bugs)
     - [Verifier bugs or features related to eBPF Instruction](#verifier-bugs-or-features-related-to-ebpf-instruction)
     - [The evolution and status of libbpf](#the-evolution-and-status-of-libbpf)
   - [Coverage of Survey Questions](#coverage-of-survey-questions)
@@ -484,10 +485,16 @@ In this step, we:
 
 ![](../imgs/timeline_commit_complexity_smoothed.png)
 
-## Deeper insight Analysis
+## Deeper insights Analysis
 
 In this section, we will delve deeper into the survey responses to identify patterns, trends, and potential areas for improvement.
 
+### What kernel components has the most frequently bugs?  
+
+By analyzing the survey responses related to the eBPF verifier, we can gain insights into the prevalence of bugs and features related to the instruction set.
+
+
+
 ### Verifier bugs or features related to eBPF Instruction
 
 By analyzing the survey responses related to the eBPF verifier, we can gain insights into the prevalence of bugs and features related to the instruction set.