Upgrading v2 to v3/v4 with multiple instances as requirement #10
-
I'm currently attempting to upgrade an old v2.4.1 to the newest v3.1.1. The currently existing use case is: should I wait for the v4 release or is there any workaround to the problem someone can share? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
Hi @Piralein! If you were to switch to the latest version v3.1.1, your use case wouldn't work with said version. As I stated in my latest comment on #6, I wasn't able to fix this at that time for v3 without breaking backwards compatibility (and thus breaking semantic versioning). However, I recently pushed a commit to the develop branch for v4 (289609b), which corrected this issue, and should also technically work with v3 with some changes - although I haven't tested that. I'll see if I can merge that specific commit with the v3 branch and release a new version in the next few days. Otherwise, development of v4 is in it's final stage and almost ready. I'll update this discussion if I manage to (or not) merge that commit with v3 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi @Piralein! If you were to switch to the latest version v3.1.1, your use case wouldn't work with said version. As I stated in my latest comment on #6, I wasn't able to fix this at that time for v3 without breaking backwards compatibility (and thus breaking semantic versioning). However, I recently pushed a commit to the develop branch for v4 (289609b), which corrected this issue, and should also technically work with v3 with some changes - although I haven't tested that.
I'll see if I can merge that specific commit with the v3 branch and release a new version in the next few days. Otherwise, development of v4 is in it's final stage and almost ready. I'll update this discussion if I mana…