You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Mr Chollet. Our professor has been having a wonderful time teaching with your book, and we're reading through up to this chapter for this semester's course.
As I was looking over your ipynb against my code, I realised that while all the programming syntax (e.g. ln 17) are OK, the first part of ln16, in the first instance a dimension is used, the VGG16 model describes itself as trained on 224 x 244 (expected 224 x 224).
Hi Mr Chollet. Our professor has been having a wonderful time teaching with your book, and we're reading through up to this chapter for this semester's course.
As I was looking over your ipynb against my code, I realised that while all the programming syntax (e.g. ln 17) are OK, the first part of ln16, in the first instance a dimension is used, the VGG16 model describes itself as trained on 224 x 244 (expected 224 x 224).
It is admittedly listed in the errata of the print edition book (https://manning-content.s3.amazonaws.com/download/9/972b1ae-dfc3-47c1-80d0-afa55c4b9415/Chollet_DeepLearninginPython_err3.html), but I see no reason why it shouldn't be fixed outright on GitHub. I tried a fix, which can be implemented if #90 is merged.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: