-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Query on using EBL model for EBL correction #155
Comments
The XML format for including the EBL in the ExpCutoff fitting is as follows. You can see the differences in the "spectrum type" line and the EBL lines that follow the ExpCutoff definition. There you have to adjust redshift, tau_norm to your source and value in ebl_model refers to the models described in https://github.com/fermi-lat/celestialSources/blob/master/eblAtten/data/README_EBLmodels.txt Finally, make sure that RA and Dec in skydirfunction are correct for your source position |
Right click to download XML file |
Can you also specify what is tau_norm parameter for a source? |
That's the optical depth for the EBL model. You can read more about that in the following link for instance |
I want to evaluate the level of EBL absorption in a LAT spectrum. I came across this girhub repository which provided a hint that some package is available for using different model (e.g. Franceschini 2008, Stecker et al 2006) for EBL correction. I cannot figure out a way to use these models in the ExpCutoff fitting. I also came across issue number #57 which hinted at a possible way to measure the level of absorption for different models.
How can I include different EBL models for cutoff correction?
Please suggest
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: