Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

models.py:255-259: Move tag's value to separated field.... #224

Open
0pdd opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

models.py:255-259: Move tag's value to separated field.... #224

0pdd opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
2 hours some big and monolith issues. For example with hard decisions or discussions 2 performer can implement issue at his closest convenient time cleanup everything that do project stronger, flexible, reusable discuss issue needs to finish discussion before start working Tags STB's feature

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Dec 17, 2018

The puzzle STB374-01960267 from #STB374 has to be resolved:

# @todo #STB374:120m Move tag's value to separated field.
# Now we have fields like `tag.name == '10 м'`.
# But should have smth like this:
# `tag.value, tag.group.measure, tag.label == 10, 'м', '10 м'`.
# Right now we should do dirty hacks for tags comparing mech.

The puzzle was created by duker33 on 17-Dec-18.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@duker33 duker33 added 2 hours some big and monolith issues. For example with hard decisions or discussions 2 performer can implement issue at his closest convenient time cleanup everything that do project stronger, flexible, reusable take it any teammate can take this issue and start working with it Tags STB's feature labels Dec 17, 2018
@duker33
Copy link
Collaborator

duker33 commented Dec 17, 2018

@artemiy312 , if you with, let's continue here the discussion about tags sorting method:
#222 (comment)

@duker33 duker33 added discuss issue needs to finish discussion before start working and removed take it any teammate can take this issue and start working with it labels Dec 17, 2018
@duker33
Copy link
Collaborator

duker33 commented Feb 26, 2019

@artemiy312 , let's move on discussion

@ArtemijRodionov
Copy link
Contributor

@duker33 Probably it would be a good issue for STB, but not for SE:

  • We bring tags for SE from SE78. SE78 provides only the alphanumeric presentation of tags, that we have to somehow parse or decompose manually
  • SE' tags have heterogeneous properties, that may not fit in this arch. The single tags group may has different or composite measures

Also we already have achieved the ability to sort the tags by alphanumeric characters, so the issue isn't seems valuable anymore

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 hours some big and monolith issues. For example with hard decisions or discussions 2 performer can implement issue at his closest convenient time cleanup everything that do project stronger, flexible, reusable discuss issue needs to finish discussion before start working Tags STB's feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants