Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redirects mech broken #360

Closed
duker33 opened this issue Jun 16, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Redirects mech broken #360

duker33 opened this issue Jun 16, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
1 hour typical issue size. It's one pdd hour 1 burning issue blocker this issue blocks another issue bug report Put it to completed tasks temporary list for business

Comments

@duker33
Copy link
Contributor

duker33 commented Jun 16, 2018

Prod db contains these urls in redirects list.
But redirect from first to second is not working

  1. https://www.shopelectro.ru/catalog/categories/akkumuliatory-270/tags/6f22/
  2. https://www.shopelectro.ru/catalog/categories/tiporazmer-6f22/
@duker33 duker33 added bug 1 hour typical issue size. It's one pdd hour 1 burning issue blocker this issue blocks another issue labels Jun 16, 2018
@duker33 duker33 self-assigned this Jun 16, 2018
@duker33 duker33 changed the title Tags mech broken Redirects mech broken Jun 18, 2018
@duker33
Copy link
Contributor Author

duker33 commented Jun 18, 2018

django standard redirects mech triggers only for not found urls
https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/contrib/redirects/middleware.py#L26

I'll try to move this app to refarm-site and customize it's behaviour for our needs

@duker33
Copy link
Contributor Author

duker33 commented Jun 22, 2018

we'll resolve this problem at fidals/refarm-site#140

Just created the test. It specifies problem

duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2018
@duker33 duker33 added the review waits for review label Jun 22, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2018
@duker33 duker33 added refine issue already have resolving code, but code needs some fixes and removed review waits for review labels Jul 3, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2018
@duker33 duker33 added the review waits for review label Jul 6, 2018
duker33 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2018
- Refresh py reqs according to stb
- Create test with unexpected behaviour explaining
- Fix commented test and refarm-site dependency
- Skip expected failure
- Review#1. Rm several asserts
- Review#2. Names and some reqs
- Skip problem test
- Skip problem test
- Lint's minor fix
@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Jul 7, 2018

@duker33 3 puzzles #405, #406, #407 are still not solved.

@duker33 duker33 added report Put it to completed tasks temporary list for business and removed refine issue already have resolving code, but code needs some fixes review waits for review labels Jul 7, 2018
@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Jul 20, 2018

@duker33 the puzzle #407 is still not solved; solved: #405, #406.

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Jul 23, 2018

@duker33 all 3 puzzles are solved here: #405, #406, #407.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 hour typical issue size. It's one pdd hour 1 burning issue blocker this issue blocks another issue bug report Put it to completed tasks temporary list for business
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants