Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison with prospite and Rails strict_loading #643

Open
aelkoussy opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comparison with prospite and Rails strict_loading #643

aelkoussy opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@aelkoussy
Copy link

Millions used and loved bullet across many years, but now other options exist, including mainly:

  1. Prospite: which claims that it has ZERO false positives, especially compared to Bullet
  2. Rails strict_loading: which is different but intersects in preventing lazy loading, thus preventing "some" of the n+1 issues

Can you please add something in the Readme about how Bullet compares to them?
Also, if we can explain how much overhead does Bullet add (performance-wise) - is it 1% slower, 10% slower or something else?
And how to avoid false positives (or false negatives) or if their percentage is small, how much is it if we have any metrics?

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant