Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sfdx force:source:pull doesn't pull changes made in formula fields #401

Open
ghost opened this issue May 11, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

sfdx force:source:pull doesn't pull changes made in formula fields #401

ghost opened this issue May 11, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
area:ui bug Issue or pull request that identifies or fixes a bug owned by another team The Salesforce CLI team does not own this work but will pass on the information to the correct team. SourceMember problems with server-side implementation of SourceMember updates

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 11, 2020

Summary

force:source:pull doesn't pull changes from scratch org made in a formula of custom field and
force:source:status doesn't recognize them as well

Steps To Reproduce:

  1. created a new number custom field - CF1__c
  2. created a new formula(number) custom field - CF2__c where I use CF1__c in the formula
  3. Both pulled (force:source:pull) successfully
  4. changed CF1__c API to CF1Test__c -> SF automatically updated API in the formula of CF2__c field
  5. pull changes again

Expected result

force:source:pull pulls changes of both fields

Actual result

only CF1Test__c field is pulled and updated, changes inside the formula field CF2__c are not pulled

Additional information

Feel free to attach a screenshot.

SFDX CLI Version
sfdx-cli/7.54.4-8ff9ba9cc5 win32-x64 node-v10.15.3

SFDX plugin Version
@oclif/plugin-autocomplete 0.1.5 (core)
@oclif/plugin-commands 1.2.3 (core)
@oclif/plugin-help 2.2.3 (core)
@oclif/plugin-not-found 1.2.3 (core)
@oclif/plugin-plugins 1.7.9 (core)
@oclif/plugin-update 1.3.9 (core)
@oclif/plugin-warn-if-update-available 1.7.0 (core)
@oclif/plugin-which 1.0.3 (core)
@salesforce/sfdx-trust 3.0.7 (core)
analytics 1.7.1 (core)
generator 1.1.2 (core)
salesforcedx 48.10.1 (core)
├─ @salesforce/sfdx-plugin-lwc-test 0.1.5 (core)
├─ salesforcedx-templates 48.8.0 (core)
└─ salesforce-alm 48.10.0 (core)

sfdx-cli 7.54.4 (core)

OS and version:
Win 10

@germangamboa95
Copy link

We are currently experiencing the same issue with various metadata objects.
Our workaround has been to pull it down using sfdx force:source:retrieve -m then specifying the thing we want.

@clairebianchi clairebianchi added the waiting for internal reply The Salesforce team is working on a fix and has promised an update label May 15, 2020
@mshanemc mshanemc added the bug Issue or pull request that identifies or fixes a bug label Oct 25, 2021
@uip-robot-zz
Copy link

This issue has been linked to a new work item: W-10081864

@mshanemc mshanemc added owned by another team The Salesforce CLI team does not own this work but will pass on the information to the correct team. and removed waiting for internal reply The Salesforce team is working on a fix and has promised an update labels Oct 25, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

We have determined that the issue you reported exists in code owned by another team that uses only the official support channels. To ensure that your issue is addressed, open an official Salesforce customer support ticket with a link to this issue. We encourage anyone experiencing this issue to do the same to increase the priority. We will keep this issue open for the community to collaborate on.

@mshanemc mshanemc added the SourceMember problems with server-side implementation of SourceMember updates label May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:ui bug Issue or pull request that identifies or fixes a bug owned by another team The Salesforce CLI team does not own this work but will pass on the information to the correct team. SourceMember problems with server-side implementation of SourceMember updates
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants