You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The uSD_nCS line passes to ground through RN6 & RN8. As a result this overcomes the internal pull-up for D4.
For my application I needed all of inputs as pull-up. To work around this I removed RN8 as I did not need uSD access.
My recommendation to improve this is to add another pair of pads with a trace between them like the I2C isolate that allows isolation of the D4 line between RN6D and the microcontoller.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the suggestion. D4 is joined to RN6 using the track shown in the screenshot, passing along the bottom layer. There's a small space in the region shown by the red highlight, so the track could be cut at that location.
The EtherTen is due for a big update anyway, to replace the old W5100 which is now becoming hard to get. I also want to change the USB socket to USB-C, and make a few other changes. I'll leave this bug open as a reminder for me to add a cut-track solder jumper in D4 for the next revision.
The uSD_nCS line passes to ground through RN6 & RN8. As a result this overcomes the internal pull-up for D4.
For my application I needed all of inputs as pull-up. To work around this I removed RN8 as I did not need uSD access.
My recommendation to improve this is to add another pair of pads with a trace between them like the I2C isolate that allows isolation of the D4 line between RN6D and the microcontoller.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: