-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 489
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there a way to disable fixed joint reduction? #2732
Comments
You can use the |
Thanks for your quick answer @traversaro . That has worked well, although I've bumped into some unexpected beahviour. Not sure if I should file this as a bug, but I would expect some kind of warning at least. As an example, the following URDF:
Is converted to the following SDF:
Where the |
Hi @toliver, I guess this is an interesting corner case in the URDF --> SDF conversions, and I guess indeed the correct way to proceed is probably to open a dedicated issue in https://github.com/osrf/sdformat . Related issues are: |
In that specific case, a possible workaround is just to directly attach |
Thanks @traversaro . It seems that gazebosim/sdformat#199 is the correct place to continue this discussion. |
When it converts a URDF to SDF, Gazebo reduces successive links that are united via fixed joints into a single link.
Is there a way to tell Gazebo to not do that (at least for a specific joint that we are interested in)?
The main reason to ask this is that this makes it impossible to declare a force torque sensor attached to a fixed joint, as it is suggested in the last section of this tutorial.
When I try to do that in the URDF, the sensor is removed together with the joint, and it does not appear in the final SDF file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: