You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't have a strong opinion on this one, but I personally like the absolute values. Let me explain why: The % by gender does not take into account the baseline reply-levels, thus for low-tweet days the gender ratio can easily flip to 100% or 0%. This makes the whole thing rather noisy and seemingly absolute.
By also plotting the (averaged) absolute numbers it's much easier to see whether an overrepresentation actually translates into a big difference (e.g. my own data in 2009/2010) or not (your data in 2014).
I think an interesting visualization would be percent by gender rather than raw gender numbers...
See: https://twtr-analyser.herokuapp.com/tweet_display/interactions/05804139/
retweets & gender
I think it's fairly consistently 1/3 female and 2/3 male, but that is hidden by the volume changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: