You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
These comments pertain to the panther site not GO, but the user ends up here when they do an enrichment so I think it's important to make some clarification from a GO point of view
The PANTHER Protein Class ontology was adapted from the PANTHER/X molecular function ontology, and includes commonly used classes of protein functions, many of which are not covered by GO molecular function
It would be useful to see more on why they are not covered. Is it a scope issue or a deficiency in GO (the way it is worded sounds like the latter)
But it's not clear what the use case is for this, or any version info (looks like this is from mid-2018?). A user may think that this is the subset used for enrichment analysis in GO.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should also be made clear in the docs (or preferably up front) that the panther enrichment tool does not include regulates relationship. This negatively affects enrichment results (many regulation annotations are within pathway, or direct upstream signalling and you need the "regulation of" terms to see these in enrichments
The Nature Protocol paper has been uploaded to the PMC, and should be freely available soon.
The About page in PANTHER is an overview of the gene families. The details about the data, including GO version and GO-slim version can be found at http://www.pantherdb.org/data/. Also, since we update GO on monthly base, its version is described on each test page.
Protein Class is not mapped to GO. It has commonly used terms such as zinc finger transcription factor or cytoskeletal protein, which are not in GO.
These comments pertain to the panther site not GO, but the user ends up here when they do an enrichment so I think it's important to make some clarification from a GO point of view
"Please refer to our article in Nature Protocols for detailed instructions on how to use this page"
When I link to the nature protocols paper outside my institution network I get "Subscribe to Journal for $495.00"
I think the documentation should be on the site rather than in a closed-source article
http://www.pantherdb.org/about.jsp
This doesn't mention the version of GO used (although you do get this when you do an enrichment analysis)
http://www.pantherdb.org/panther/ontologies.jsp
It would be useful to see more on why they are not covered. Is it a scope issue or a deficiency in GO (the way it is worded sounds like the latter)
There is a link to the panther ontology http://data.pantherdb.org/PANTHER14.0/ontology/Protein_Class_14.0 but there are no mappings to GO
"PANTHER uses only a subset of GO terms (“GO slim”) to facilitate browsing. Download the PANTHER GO slim."
http://data.pantherdb.org/PANTHER14.0/ontology/PANTHERGOslim.obo
But it's not clear what the use case is for this, or any version info (looks like this is from mid-2018?). A user may think that this is the subset used for enrichment analysis in GO.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: