-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Entities with multiple communes #53
Comments
For CJL, the association CartoJuraLéman is member of the group and not their partners (communes et associations de commune). |
Thanks @rogermaurer for your feedback regarding CJL. And what about Morges, should we keep both or not? |
As discussed by phone, we can only keep CJL in the UG list. |
In principle not, because Morges is also a partner of the association. |
Yes only, CartoJuraLéman (district of Morges). |
If not, you have to add 31 municipalities and 9 associations. The list would be too long, wouldn' it ? |
For Cartoriviera, just mention Cartoriviera and not all the communes |
Yes. |
Okay, thanks. |
As mentionned here #52 (comment), we need to clarify who is member of the UserGroup [1] in the case of entities with multiple communes.
As @kalbermattenm suggests, we need to get an answer from these entities.
AFAIK, we have:
Cartoriviera/Vevey @gnerred > CartorivieraCJL/Morges @rogermaurer > CartoJuraLéman (district of Morges)Feel free to add other entities.
Edit: [1] UG list
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: