You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Overall listing: During a data model design webinar, a contributor was asking if we had metadata template for X, i.e. because the data model design involves importing templates / customizing templates as needed. A clearer listing would help clarify this.
Preview for each template: Currently we embed spreadsheets for previews of the metadata templates. Unfortunately, these load more slowly than expected (for example, Imaging Level 2 takes five seconds to display). Moreover, hovering over column headers don't provide descriptions the way a standalone sheets in the browser does. So embedding the spreadsheets was the easiest preview method, and what we went with because there were many other parts of the docs that needed to be prioritized first, but as previews go these get maybe 2 stars out of 5 on helpfulness/informativeness. We should revisit this to try for something that's at least 4 stars on helpfulness.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Several user stories here:
Overall listing: During a data model design webinar, a contributor was asking if we had metadata template for X, i.e. because the data model design involves importing templates / customizing templates as needed. A clearer listing would help clarify this.
Preview for each template: Currently we embed spreadsheets for previews of the metadata templates. Unfortunately, these load more slowly than expected (for example,
Imaging Level 2
takes five seconds to display). Moreover, hovering over column headers don't provide descriptions the way a standalone sheets in the browser does. So embedding the spreadsheets was the easiest preview method, and what we went with because there were many other parts of the docs that needed to be prioritized first, but as previews go these get maybe 2 stars out of 5 on helpfulness/informativeness. We should revisit this to try for something that's at least 4 stars on helpfulness.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: