You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the original evaluation scheme of the Apollo Synthetic dataset, ground truth lanes are considered in the lateral (x-) range [-30 m, 30 m]. In the paper I only found that the final grid size used for both datasets is [-10 m, 10 m] lateral and [3 m, 103 m] longitudinal. To my understanding there should be no key-points to represent lanes in the range [-30 m, -10 m] and [10 m, 30 m], but still the detection scores are pretty high and far-range errors fairly low.
How is this possible? Was the grid size enlarged for Apollo or was the Apollo evaluation scheme adapted with ground truth lanes being pruned to [-10 m, 10 m] lateral (as it is the case for OpenLane evaluation)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the original evaluation scheme of the Apollo Synthetic dataset, ground truth lanes are considered in the lateral (x-) range [-30 m, 30 m]. In the paper I only found that the final grid size used for both datasets is [-10 m, 10 m] lateral and [3 m, 103 m] longitudinal. To my understanding there should be no key-points to represent lanes in the range [-30 m, -10 m] and [10 m, 30 m], but still the detection scores are pretty high and far-range errors fairly low.
How is this possible? Was the grid size enlarged for Apollo or was the Apollo evaluation scheme adapted with ground truth lanes being pruned to [-10 m, 10 m] lateral (as it is the case for OpenLane evaluation)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: