Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FANET messages by the OGN tracker #107

Open
acasadoalonso opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

FANET messages by the OGN tracker #107

acasadoalonso opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@acasadoalonso
Copy link

This is an example of APRS message generated by the OGN station when it receives a FANET message generated by an OGN tracker

OGN085B5C>OGNFNT,qAS,GETRONIX:/175419h4804.35N\01444.09En !W88! id3F085B5C FNT71 55.0dB

it is not OGNTRK on the tocall ID, it is OGNFNT in the tocall ID, other than that the structure is similar to the FNTxxxxxx messages.

@Meisterschueler
Copy link
Collaborator

@acasadoalonso : is there any specification of how these beacons can look like?

@acasadoalonso
Copy link
Author

I showed an example above
The syntax is the same that the FNT messages, the only differences is that are originated by OGN trackers OGNxxxxxx and the “tocall” is OGNFNT

@Meisterschueler
Copy link
Collaborator

No, this is wrong. We see an APRS position message with timestamp and comment. The comment is the part "id3F085B5C FNT71 55.0dB". The regex for the FNT (position) comment is:
(id(?P<details>[\dA-F]{2})(?P<address>[\dA-F]{6}?)\s?)?(?:(?P<climb_rate>[+-]\d+)fpm)?
See also here:

PATTERN_FANET_POSITION_COMMENT = re.compile(r"""

So the line (more exactly the APRS comment) would not pass the FNT messages parser.

@acasadoalonso
Copy link
Author

acasadoalonso commented Mar 12, 2022 via email

@Meisterschueler
Copy link
Collaborator

This is correct. They look similar and they have the same undocumented structure. And because of this they also do not pass the parser.

@acasadoalonso
Copy link
Author

acasadoalonso commented Mar 12, 2022 via email

@acasadoalonso
Copy link
Author

acasadoalonso commented Mar 12, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants