You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to ISO 10241-1:2011, 6.8, "If an entire terminological entry, a language section of a terminological entry, a term, letter symbol, graphical symbol, definition, context, non-verbal representation or example has been taken from another standard, … the source should be indicated. Modifications to the content of the source should be made explicit by adding an explanation to the indication of the source. …The indication of the source should be in coded form and a link or reference to a standard bibliographic description provided."
This means that we need to have SOURCE for these elements:
concept entry
language of entry's
term
letter symbol, graphical symbol
definition
context
non-verbal representation
Modifications to SOURCE'd elements also need to be desired (if there was a modification).
A source should contain a link or reference to the bibliographic item which the element was SOURCE'd from.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[...] ISO 10241-1:2011 contains some examples of source references with titles
although I agree that for a standard, one would not normally include the title as described in ISO 10241-1:2011, 6.8, but this is only a recommendation: “The indication of the source should be in coded form and a link or reference to a standard bibliographic description provided.”
Meanwhile, since the rules do not prohibit the inclusion of a title, we should not either.
Maybe you should allow for a short form (without a title) and a long form (with a title) of an xref, where the short form is the default?
So we should allow for a short form (without title) and also a long form (with title, even in the case of a standard), depending on user preference.
Technically, we should allow entering references in ISO 690 format because ISO 10241-1 accepts only the ISO 690 bibliographic format...
This needs to be dealt with in the concept-model and Glossarist.
In addition,
By the way are you aware of the following rule:
This rule applies when a SOURCE only applies to a single language term.
This confirms that SOURCE can apply additionally per-language in addition to per-concept.
This means that we need to have SOURCE for these elements:
Modifications to SOURCE'd elements also need to be desired (if there was a modification).
A source should contain a link or reference to the bibliographic item which the element was SOURCE'd from.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: