Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IEV improvements: properly model "source" #14

Open
ronaldtse opened this issue Apr 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

IEV improvements: properly model "source" #14

ronaldtse opened this issue Apr 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Member

ronaldtse commented Apr 25, 2020

According to ISO 10241-1:2011, 6.8, "If an entire terminological entry, a language section of a terminological entry, a term, letter symbol, graphical symbol, definition, context, non-verbal representation or example has been taken from another standard, … the source should be indicated. Modifications to the content of the source should be made explicit by adding an explanation to the indication of the source. …The indication of the source should be in coded form and a link or reference to a standard bibliographic description provided."

This means that we need to have SOURCE for these elements:

  • concept entry
  • language of entry's
  • term
  • letter symbol, graphical symbol
  • definition
  • context
  • non-verbal representation

Modifications to SOURCE'd elements also need to be desired (if there was a modification).

A source should contain a link or reference to the bibliographic item which the element was SOURCE'd from.

@ronaldtse ronaldtse added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 25, 2020
@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

"context" is vague, and nothing directly matches it; have extended trailing ConceptSource to examples (explicitly names) and notes.

opoudjis added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2020
@ronaldtse
Copy link
Member Author

From IEC (glossarist/iev-data#62 (comment))

[...] ISO 10241-1:2011 contains some examples of source references with titles

image003
image005

although I agree that for a standard, one would not normally include the title as described in ISO 10241-1:2011, 6.8, but this is only a recommendation: “The indication of the source should be in coded form and a link or reference to a standard bibliographic description provided.”

Meanwhile, since the rules do not prohibit the inclusion of a title, we should not either.

Maybe you should allow for a short form (without a title) and a long form (with a title) of an xref, where the short form is the default?

So we should allow for a short form (without title) and also a long form (with title, even in the case of a standard), depending on user preference.

Technically, we should allow entering references in ISO 690 format because ISO 10241-1 accepts only the ISO 690 bibliographic format...

This needs to be dealt with in the concept-model and Glossarist.

In addition,

By the way are you aware of the following rule:
image008

This rule applies when a SOURCE only applies to a single language term.

This confirms that SOURCE can apply additionally per-language in addition to per-concept.

@opoudjis opoudjis assigned opoudjis and unassigned opoudjis Mar 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants