Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What happens if the no one provides a solution #19

Open
josojo opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

What happens if the no one provides a solution #19

josojo opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@josojo
Copy link
Contributor

josojo commented Jan 15, 2019

Proposal:
In case no solution is provided or only invalid solutions, the orders can be omitted by the smart contract and the smart contract will restart the auction for a new batch.

@bh2smith
Copy link
Contributor

Technically speaking, this would be equivalent to applying the NullAuction (which still lies feasible region of the optimization problem).

Perhaps it would make sense to impose a time limit before the null results can be applied.

@oliverbeige
Copy link
Contributor

Is this a scenario for after we turn off the default solver? An alternative scenario would be to run a low cost default solver, e.g. a neural network after our default solver becomes obsolete. At the biz end, this would also be a topic for the community fund. NullAuction should be the very last resort.

@oliverbeige
Copy link
Contributor

Reopened...

@josojo
Copy link
Contributor Author

josojo commented Jan 18, 2019

Is this a scenario for after we turn off the default solver?

We hope that it never happens, but it could always happen. Just it all our services are down or if miners censor all blocks and mine empty blocks

@bh2smith
Copy link
Contributor

I will not be able to propose a reasonable implementation of this until I get to the point in the contract where it becomes necessary. I think we will have much clearer vision on what makes the most sense "architecturally" when we have the infrastructure to support it.

@bh2smith bh2smith added the question Further information is requested label Apr 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants