Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dedicated Context Constructions for Termination Analysis #1422

Open
michael-schwarz opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Dedicated Context Constructions for Termination Analysis #1422

michael-schwarz opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@michael-schwarz
Copy link
Member

As #1413 and the associated regressions show, having more precise (and potentially fewer) contexts is not always beneficial when attempting to prove termination of recursive programs (when we have partial contexts).

It would be interesting to evaluate new constructions here and how helpful they are for the SV-COMP termination categories. Ideas may be:

  • Baseline: Experiment with full context for all recursive functions in the termination category (disabling the autotuner that disables interval and interval set contexts in recursive calls)
  • A flavor of context gas (master thesis: Taming Recursion with Three Context-Sensitive Analyses (Callstring, LoopfreeCallstring, Context Gas) #1340) that starts out with full context and then switches to no-interval in context for recursive procedures
  • A dedicated construction to always unroll recursion k-deep (via contexts) where k could, e.g., be a function of the magnitude of the argument given to procedures identified as recursive (might capture quite a few SV-COMP style tasks).
  • ...

These are quite disconnected from everything else, and could, e.g., be given to Master's students.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants