Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 11, 2022. It is now read-only.

Allow unregistering of handlers on a per-event class basis #4

Open
spg opened this issue May 31, 2013 · 5 comments
Open

Allow unregistering of handlers on a per-event class basis #4

spg opened this issue May 31, 2013 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@spg
Copy link

spg commented May 31, 2013

According to EventBinderTest, when presenter.handlerRegistration.removeHandler() is called, all handlers are unregistered, regardless of the event's type.

It would be awesome if one could unregister only handlers of a particular event type, e.g.: presenter.handlerRegistration.removeHandler(SecondEvent.class);

@gkdn
Copy link
Member

gkdn commented May 31, 2013

If we let you to remove handlers by event then the next thing will be to provide an API to add them back.
That would just make these more complicated.
If you need to manage an event independently from the rest of the class, best thing to do is to add handlers for it without EventBinder.

@ekuefler
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I agree with Goktug here. It's a lot easier to reason about how your class will work when either all @eventhandler methods are active or none of them are. Selectively removing handlers can make for really frustrating debugging when you're trying to figure out why one of your handlers isn't working and the rest all are.

If you want to be able to remove an individual handler, there's no reason you can't add it directly to the event bus and manage it outside of EventBinder - mixing @EventHandlers with normal calls to addHandler works fine. That way you can remove individual registrations while still having confidence that things declared as @EventHandlers will continue to work reliably.

Does that solution work for you?

@christiangoudreau
Copy link

My opinion is different, it is not unusual to have visibility handlers that are added and removed automatically depending if something is shown or not.

I've made the proposition into a post to be able to specify the EventBinder on wich a EventHandler can be bound simply by adding a parameter inside the annotation that takes the .class of the EventBinder to register the events.

@gkdn
Copy link
Member

gkdn commented Jun 4, 2013

@christiangoudreau, can you provide more concrete examples for your use cases?

@christiangoudreau
Copy link

Dynamic places, Dynamic tabs (linked to places), other cases when you want only the visible presenters to update when an event is thrown. (Servers update) Etc.

Doesn't happen often in simple apps though

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants