You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I currently have a computationally intensive algorithm program, where the input is a collection of highly complex nested protobuf type data. The computation time for each time(frame) is approximately 100ms.
I want to increase branch coverage and explore possible crash risks by importing production data (real data from various proto fields) and then using protobuf mutator to mutate a large number of values near the production data for the fuzzing test.
Is protobuf mutator feasible for my situation? Mainly considering two issues
The protobuf of production data is very large. For one frame calculation of the program, some of the serialized message of protobuf may have a size over 1M. I'm not sure about the effeciency of the mutator under this circumstance.
Does the slow computation per frame (100ms per frame) also make the mutator inefficient?
Finally, if the libprotobuf-mutator is not suitable for my situation, is there any recommended approcach for doing fuzzing test for highly complex nested protobuf in (computationally intensive algorithm)/(slow C++ program) ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I currently have a computationally intensive algorithm program, where the input is a collection of
highly complex nested protobuf
type data. The computation time for each time(frame) is approximately 100ms.I want to increase branch coverage and explore possible crash risks by importing production data (real data from various proto fields) and then using protobuf mutator to mutate a large number of values near the production data for the fuzzing test.
Is protobuf mutator feasible for my situation? Mainly considering two issues
The protobuf of production data is very large. For one frame calculation of the program, some of the serialized message of protobuf may have a size over 1M. I'm not sure about the effeciency of the mutator under this circumstance.
Does the slow computation per frame (100ms per frame) also make the mutator inefficient?
Finally, if the libprotobuf-mutator is not suitable for my situation, is there any recommended approcach for doing
fuzzing test for highly complex nested protobuf in (computationally intensive algorithm)/(slow C++ program)
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: