Add shutdown options for the client classes

[feywind]

We are planning to add updates to the close() methods to allow for a more deterministic shutdown process. This will take care of issues like these:

#1860
#1856
#1665
#1648

The three options boil down to this:

• Wait for everything to finish dequeuing
• Bail immediately (and maybe return IDs of things that were pending)
• Nack everything in the queue and wait for those to send

[modestaspruckus]

Hey, any update on this, when it's planned to have proper close method?

[mcasarrubios]

Hi @feywind, is there a time estimate planned for this? This is something we need to be able to do a graceful shutdown.
Thanks in advance

[mcasarrubios]

For us, the ideal solution would be this point ‘Wait for everything to finish dequeuing’.

[feywind]

@mcasarrubios Thanks for the input. Right now you can already do the basic "wait for dequeue" using these methods:

• subscriber.close()
• topic.flush()

The extra thing we want to add is allowing options for how to handle outstanding data (e.g. drop everything on the floor and quit immediately).

[mcasarrubios]

Hey @feywind, thank you for your response. Could you please share an example of how to do this? I can't get it to work.

This is the flow I am trying:

1.- Receive a SIGTERM
2.- Call topic.flush() for each topic
3.- Delay 1 second to wait to everything is flushed
4.- Call subscription.close() for each subscription
5.- Wait several seconds to allow the messages to finish their execution and can send the ACK
6.- Continue with the shutdown

Everything works as expected until step 5. When we close the subscriptions no new messages come in for processing.
The problem is that the messages that are processing fail when they are going to ACK the message with the following error message:
"Error: INVALID : Subscriber closed\n at AckQueue.add..."