You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you @gordicaleksa for the tutorial and implementation of GAT, which made me understand it smoothly and walk through the codes sucessfully !
Here I still have a question when I run the codes of PPI dataset. In the code you have mentioned that skip connection is important and keep it otherwise the micro-F1 is almost 0, and I am wondering that the reason of the appearance of 0 is that, something leads some values(such as loss, feature etc.) to be nan during training?
More details:
The framework I used to train is paddlepaddle instead of pytorch. When I ran my code, I found that the value of loss would be nan finally, making the micro-F1 be 0. This strange phenomenon occurs whether I use skip connection or not. Furthemore, when I set skip connection to False, the value of micro-F1 first rises normally to about 0.7, then suddenly becomes 0, however, when I set skip connection to True, the value micro-F1 also rises normally first, to around 0.9, and suddenly becomes 0.
When I checked it, I found the appearance of NaN during training. This problem has always puzzled me, so I wonder that is there the same issue during your implemrntation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you @gordicaleksa for the tutorial and implementation of GAT, which made me understand it smoothly and walk through the codes sucessfully !
Here I still have a question when I run the codes of PPI dataset. In the code you have mentioned that skip connection is important and keep it otherwise the micro-F1 is almost 0, and I am wondering that the reason of the appearance of 0 is that, something leads some values(such as loss, feature etc.) to be nan during training?
More details:
The framework I used to train is paddlepaddle instead of pytorch. When I ran my code, I found that the value of loss would be nan finally, making the micro-F1 be 0. This strange phenomenon occurs whether I use skip connection or not. Furthemore, when I set skip connection to False, the value of micro-F1 first rises normally to about 0.7, then suddenly becomes 0, however, when I set skip connection to True, the value micro-F1 also rises normally first, to around 0.9, and suddenly becomes 0.
When I checked it, I found the appearance of NaN during training. This problem has always puzzled me, so I wonder that is there the same issue during your implemrntation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: