Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pyroscope forwarding through Alloy #984

Closed
jalaziz opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Pyroscope forwarding through Alloy #984

jalaziz opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@jalaziz
Copy link

jalaziz commented Jun 5, 2024

Request

Currently, Alloy only supports forwarding pyroscope profiles scraped from pprof endpoints, eBPF, and Java. It would be great if Allow could act as a general Pyroscope proxy, exposing an HTTP endpoint sink that can accept submitted profiles and forward them to a deployed Pryroscope instance or Grafana Cloud.

Use case

The pyroscope SDKs offer support for many languages. However, using the SDK to push profiles to Grafana Cloud in certain environments can be problematic or difficult due to network restrictions and secrets management.

Many other solutions (Vector, Grafana Agent, etc), support models where metrics, logs, traces, etc can be pushed to a private (or even local) endpoint that then forwards to a hosted service.

Having Alloy act as a Pyroscope forwarder / proxy allows for secure and scalable deployment models where applications can push profiles to a local Alloy agent (e.g. k8s Daemonset), which then further route profiles to an Alloy agent with public internet access and Grafana Cloud credentials configured.

@jalaziz jalaziz added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 6, 2024

This issue has not had any activity in the past 30 days, so the needs-attention label has been added to it.
If the opened issue is a bug, check to see if a newer release fixed your issue. If it is no longer relevant, please feel free to close this issue.
The needs-attention label signals to maintainers that something has fallen through the cracks. No action is needed by you; your issue will be kept open and you do not have to respond to this comment. The label will be removed the next time this job runs if there is new activity.
Thank you for your contributions!

@ptodev
Copy link
Collaborator

ptodev commented Aug 21, 2024

Hi @jalaziz! Thank you for raising an issue. I'm going to close this one, because it seems to be a duplicate of #270.

@ptodev ptodev closed this as completed Aug 21, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants