-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 819
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Residential landuse too light on midzoom #1755
Comments
What about landuses in cities, like industrial, retail, and commercial? |
I would consider farmland as the worst problem with #1701 as potential method for solving it. |
@pnorman As far as I remember there was a proposition to aggregate all of human-related areas into something grey (residential or close to it) on some low enough zoom level. |
In addition to #1701 it might make sense to also brighten the grass color a bit, Lch(92,32,128) seems to work fine, even brighter would collide with campsite. This is how this looks at z12: It could also make sense, at z12 and especially at z<12, to darken the urban landuses somewhat - would need to take care to maintain sufficient contrast with the minor roads of course. |
This is improved by #1701, after this is rolled out we'd need to see if changes to residential is necessary too. |
I think that built-up areas should be more prominent. |
Resolved by #2654. |
Now residential roads no longer show up on zoomlevels 12 and smaller, residential areas have become a lot lighter on mid zoom levels:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=11/49.5918/6.1736
Forests and farmland are more colourful, so they attract more visual attention than residential. I would consider residential more important than other landuse at zoomlevels 10-12, so maybe we could make residential a bit darker on these zoomlevels?
CC @pnorman
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: