Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

waterway=ditch in a forest, colored over the forest #2629

Closed
AllroadsNL opened this issue May 10, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

waterway=ditch in a forest, colored over the forest #2629

AllroadsNL opened this issue May 10, 2017 · 9 comments

Comments

@AllroadsNL
Copy link

AllroadsNL commented May 10, 2017

In a forest, when drawn in the ditches.
On level 13 you already see the ditches in the forest.
This give a blue look, not seeing the forest anymore.

Example:
Here is a mountain bike route, through several ditches.
The reason to draw in the ditches.

Ditches are 50 cm deep. 1- 1,30 wide, most of the time dry and flows in to the 70-100 deep ditch.

For me showing at level 17 would be fine.
Two plots where drawn in yet, but the whole forest have ditches.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/52.6587/5.9629

level 13
ditch 13

level 14
ditch 14

level 15
ditch 15

level 16
ditch 16

level 17
ditch 17

@imagico
Copy link
Collaborator

imagico commented May 10, 2017

So the issue is about waterway=ditch being rendered too early at z13 in your opinion?

This is more or less the same as #1101 suggests for waterway=drain. The minor waterways at the lowest zoom level (z13) could be slightly reduced in width and casing strength probably though they were increased in width for a reason (#967). Note we do not want to start ditches later than streams due to #2346.

If these are dry most of the time you should tag them intermittent=yes by the way - no matter if that looks good on the map or not at the moment.

@AllroadsNL
Copy link
Author

Yes, rendered too earlier on z13.
I would say, z16 z17

Forget, to search for a earlier issue.!

Intermittent=yes, I know,
Now intermittent, the right side of the example, compare.

z13
int ditch 13

z14
int ditch 14

z15
int ditch 15

z16
int ditch 16

z17
int ditch 17

@AllroadsNL
Copy link
Author

Not the solution, I think.
right side.
intermittent=yes
waterway=ditch
Zoomlevel 15
int ditch 15 black
Zoomlevel 17
int ditch 17 black

@nebulon42
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, this is a regression. See #2636.

@kocio-pl
Copy link
Collaborator

With merging #2654 (and resolving #1781 of course) this problem is now even more visible:

z13
Before (took from the original report)
ditch 13
After
yqp7tiqx

@AllroadsNL
Copy link
Author

In the right field of waterways, the lower 7 waterways are waterway=drain and intermittent=yes.

@wmyrda
Copy link

wmyrda commented Aug 31, 2017

It is not that steams/ditches/drains are displayed to early. They simply have this unnecessary white outline around them which makes them appear twice as wide as they actually are which is especially visible in the forest http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/50.1657/22.0304 Now that the water color have changed that white line surrounding them could be removed.

@kocio-pl kocio-pl self-assigned this Aug 31, 2017
@kocio-pl
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm afraid this could lead to a problem like #2098.

@kocio-pl kocio-pl mentioned this issue Oct 28, 2018
@kocio-pl
Copy link
Collaborator

kocio-pl commented Dec 1, 2018

This case seems to be OK, with ditched from z14 and intermittent ditches from z15, effectively resolved by #3467, so I will close it now. If there will be some other cases which are still troublesome, we can reopen ticket and discuss it further.

@kocio-pl kocio-pl closed this as completed Dec 1, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants