-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 819
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
waterway=ditch in a forest, colored over the forest #2629
Comments
So the issue is about This is more or less the same as #1101 suggests for If these are dry most of the time you should tag them |
Yes, this is a regression. See #2636. |
In the right field of waterways, the lower 7 waterways are waterway=drain and intermittent=yes. |
It is not that steams/ditches/drains are displayed to early. They simply have this unnecessary white outline around them which makes them appear twice as wide as they actually are which is especially visible in the forest http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/50.1657/22.0304 Now that the water color have changed that white line surrounding them could be removed. |
I'm afraid this could lead to a problem like #2098. |
This case seems to be OK, with ditched from z14 and intermittent ditches from z15, effectively resolved by #3467, so I will close it now. If there will be some other cases which are still troublesome, we can reopen ticket and discuss it further. |
In a forest, when drawn in the ditches.
On level 13 you already see the ditches in the forest.
This give a blue look, not seeing the forest anymore.
Example:
Here is a mountain bike route, through several ditches.
The reason to draw in the ditches.
Ditches are 50 cm deep. 1- 1,30 wide, most of the time dry and flows in to the 70-100 deep ditch.
For me showing at level 17 would be fine.
Two plots where drawn in yet, but the whole forest have ditches.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/52.6587/5.9629
level 13
level 14
level 15
level 16
level 17
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: