-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 819
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
include spacial urban amenities in 'built-up-upper-lowzoom' #3007
Comments
It's a follow up to #2654 (in practice that's just fine tuning this code). Examples of the problem:
|
I ask you to pay attention to landuse=railway http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430173017#map=14/51.6062/45.9457&layers=D |
Your intended link is probably http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430173017#map=14/51.6062/45.9457 |
yes. I confused. thank you |
Are you sure all such problems have been fixed? |
As amenity areas may be so big that they are visible on zoom levels lower than z13, and allotments should be treated as natural areas, I'm not sure if rest from the objects mentioned above are worth changes because they are usually too small to see them on <z13. |
In mid and low zoom, currently the following landuses are rendered in gray (built-up-upper-lowzoom #c0c0c0, built-up-lower-lowzoom 11-12 #aaaaaa):
Spacial amenities (i.e. campuses) and other landuses are often left without surrounding landuse tag, thus they leave holes in the midzoom areas that would be considered as built-up.
Examples (currently rendered from):
To avoid the holes, these features should be assigned the built-up colour in the mid and zoom levels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: