Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop amenity=telephone from z17 #4002

Open
Prince-Kassad opened this issue Jan 11, 2020 · 7 comments
Open

Drop amenity=telephone from z17 #4002

Prince-Kassad opened this issue Jan 11, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@Prince-Kassad
Copy link

Split from #1745

The amount of public telephones is rapidly decreasing both in developed and developing countries (not so much in OSM, unfortunately, because we can't keep up with the deconstruction of public telephones). Where public telephones still exist, they're usually not used for their telephone feature. For example, in Germany, public telephones in larger cities also function as a wifi hotspot, and most people will use the telephone for the wifi hotspot rather than its phone feature. Public telephones in small villages, where they still exist, are simple models that cannot be used for anything other than emergency calls.

See an example where current amenity=telephone clutters the map:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.13321/8.91777&layers=N

It's debatable at which zoom level it is appropriate to render public telephones. I personally think z19 is too late (and think emergency=phone should be pushed back up to z18 for the same reason), but z17 is definitely too early, as you can see from the provided link.

@imagico
Copy link
Collaborator

imagico commented Jan 11, 2020

I don't think the idea of hiding the rendering of phones at lower zoom levels because there are many of these mapped which do not exist any more is a good approach.

In general my opinion on this is already stated in #1884 (comment) - if the map is too full at z17 my approach would be to move other things to higher zoom levels like shops, restaurants etc. Public phones as a possibility to call for help in a case of emergency and as one of the few anonymous communication possibilities that exists in many countries today are IMO an important infrastructure, especially if they become more rare these days.

@kocio-pl
Copy link
Collaborator

Yet this is not an emergency map, it's a general map (if it was, I believe #3629 should be very visible). Also relying on importance as a primary feature for such general thing as zoom levels is very subjective and makes it very impossible to create any order of objects.

@Adamant36
Copy link
Contributor

Like 67 percent of the worlds population has cell phones now. So, I think an argument could be made that are mostly sorta historical artifacts at this point. Even in places where they are available I doubt they get used that much. Except for the anonymous reasons you state, but id guess even that is largely done on a cell phone now.

Personally, I would put them in the same category as things like changing tables (except less so). Something important to some people, that would be good on a specialized map, but probably not great for a general map at this point. This issue isn't even about getting rid of them completely either.

Btw, its also worth mentioning that mapping of pay phones has pretty much bottomed out and seems to be declining since mid 2018. Plus, who knows how many of those are actually even around or usable anymore. IMO you could almost remove rendering of them completely and it probably wouldn't matter, but also rendering them lower is fine also.

@kennykb
Copy link

kennykb commented Jan 13, 2020 via email

@Prince-Kassad
Copy link
Author

Note that this PR is not about emergency=phone, that was moved to z19 in #2993.

@kennykb
Copy link

kennykb commented Jan 13, 2020 via email

@imagico
Copy link
Collaborator

imagico commented Jan 13, 2020

Just for clarification - #2993 was merged without consensus - as can be seen already in #1884.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants