From 58ab9028f7d55f0a74fe0b2b546e156206e8c950 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Giuseppe Silano Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:29:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add missing info RAM paper --- _bibliography/refs.bib | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/_bibliography/refs.bib b/_bibliography/refs.bib index d708cae..e6ad0d4 100644 --- a/_bibliography/refs.bib +++ b/_bibliography/refs.bib @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ @ARTICLE{Silano2023SurveySimulator preprint = {publications/survey_simulators.pdf}, doi = {10.1109/MRA.2024.3433171}, journal = {IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine}, + year = {2024}, + status = {In Press}, + link = {https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10665978}, abstract = {Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) research faces challenges with safety, scalability, costs, and ecological impact when conducting hardware testing. High-fidelity simulators offer a vital solution by replicating real-world conditions to enable the development and evaluation of novel perception and control algorithms. However, the large number of available simulators poses a significant challenge for researchers to determine which simulator best suits their specific use-case, based on each simulator’s limitations and customization readiness. In this paper we present an overview of 44 UAV simulators, including in-depth, systematic comparisons for 14 of the simulators. Additionally, we present a set of decision factors for selection of simulators, aiming to enhance the efficiency and safety of research endeavors.} }