You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So we take the fraction of ensemble members that have snowfall >= 0.1cm.
I think we should instead interpret the snow probability as fraction of members that have precipitation AND this precipitation is frozen.
So we should only consider the members that have precipitation >=0.1mm, and over these members see which members have snowfall. This should give a more appropriate estimation of snow probability.
Also, the logic of computing both probabilities I think should go into the get_ensemble_data function instead than sitting in this function that is only used to create the figure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At the moment snow probability is computed in the same way precipitation probability is computed here
point_wx/src/pages/ensemble/figures.py
Lines 210 to 217 in b3cf037
So we take the fraction of ensemble members that have snowfall >= 0.1cm.
I think we should instead interpret the snow probability as fraction of members that have precipitation AND this precipitation is frozen.
So we should only consider the members that have precipitation >=0.1mm, and over these members see which members have snowfall. This should give a more appropriate estimation of snow probability.
Also, the logic of computing both probabilities I think should go into the
get_ensemble_data
function instead than sitting in this function that is only used to create the figure.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: