Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for removal of rgruebel/ha_zigbee2mqtt_networkmap #2517

Closed
4 tasks done
jtomaszk opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by hacs/default#1259
Closed
4 tasks done

Request for removal of rgruebel/ha_zigbee2mqtt_networkmap #2517

jtomaszk opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by hacs/default#1259
Assignees
Labels
flag Flagging of repository that should be removed from HACS

Comments

@jtomaszk
Copy link

Repository

rgruebel/ha_zigbee2mqtt_networkmap

Checklist

  • I understand that this form should only be used for repositories that needs to be removed from HACS
  • I understand that a bug is not reason enough to have a repository removed
  • The repository is currently shipped as a default repository in HACS
  • I have tried to get the authors attention to the reason for removal

Why should this be removed?

integration broken for HA >= 2021.12

Link to issue

rgruebel/ha_zigbee2mqtt_networkmap#42

@jtomaszk jtomaszk added the flag Flagging of repository that should be removed from HACS label Feb 17, 2022
@hacs-bot
Copy link

hacs-bot bot commented Feb 17, 2022

Make sure you have read the issue guidelines and that you filled out the entire template.

If you have an issue identical to this, do not add comments like "same here", "i have this too", instead add a 👍 reaction to the issue description. Thanks! 👍

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 6, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
flag Flagging of repository that should be removed from HACS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants