From fc52b6ab7a59f6c8433ebac7f9b98a0ca90b1abb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: amjjbonvin Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 09:59:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Corrected link --- education/HADDOCK24/HADDOCK24-antibody-antigen-basic/index.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/education/HADDOCK24/HADDOCK24-antibody-antigen-basic/index.md b/education/HADDOCK24/HADDOCK24-antibody-antigen-basic/index.md index 8c3e5a6c..0e74c7b6 100644 --- a/education/HADDOCK24/HADDOCK24-antibody-antigen-basic/index.md +++ b/education/HADDOCK24/HADDOCK24-antibody-antigen-basic/index.md @@ -746,7 +746,8 @@ Examine the various models. How does the orientation of the antigen differ betwe **Note** that the scale in the B-factor field is the inverse of the color coding in the PAE plots: i.e. red mean reliable (high pLDDT) and blue unreliable (low pLDDT)). If you want to have the inverse coloring - you can use a PyMol plugin, e.g. as described [here](https://github.com/cbalbin-bio/pymol-color-alphafold){:target="\_blank"} + you can use a PyMol plugin, e.g. as described here +
Since we do have NMR chemical shift perturbation data for the antigen, let's check if the perturbed residues are at the interface in the AF2 models.