CQL for a more advanced search

[ngawangtrinley]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not a request per se. Just wondering if you thought about making the search a bit more powerful with multi-token CQL style queries.

Describe the solution you'd like
Something like this or this

[PonteIneptique]

I understand the need but there is close to no chance this feature comes on pyrrha. This is a very different structure. On the other hand, you can always export to tei and use xquery or the likes to do so? Le mer. 12 août 2020 à 5:34 PM, ngawangtrinley <[email protected]> a écrit :

…

*Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.* Not a request per se. Just wondering if you thought about making the search a bit more powerful with multi-token CQL style queries. *Describe the solution you'd like* Something like this <https://github.com/proycon/pynlpl/blob/master/pynlpl/formats/cql.py> or this <https://explosion.ai/demos/matcher> — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#200>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOXEZSBSJSB5EEFVTGBVM3SAKY7JANCNFSM4P44DTHA> .

[PonteIneptique]

Retroactively, I think some of it is possible, but we'll need to "control" how much.
Basically, playing with (token.order_id - current_token.order_id) < Y or something like that, we should be able to introduce some contextual search

[ngawangtrinley]

That looks interesting! @lungsang could you have a look at this next week?

[PonteIneptique]

This would have to be at least reduced in scope: only one previous token and one next token, but this seems doable :)

[lungsang]

That looks interesting! @lungsang could you have a look at this next week?

Okay